Iranian Political Studies

Iranian Political Studies

The Impact of Sanctions on Iran-China Trade Interactions: Political Risks and Financial Flexibility

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 1- Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
2 Visiting Professor, Department of Political Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
3 Master’s degree in political science, Department of Political Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
Abstract
Imposing sanctions is a tool to increase pressure on countries' political risk, an issue the United States has been implementing especially since 2018, with its unilateral sanctions against Iran. The main purpose of this study is to examine the impact of sanctions on trade with China and identify ways to improve them. A review of the time series of Iran-China trade from 2000 to 2021 shows that although trade transactions were continuous during the period of sanctions before 2018, they fluctuated in response to sanctions, and trade fell to its lowest level in 2018. The study of existing strategies for maintaining the level of Iran-China exchanges indicates that the development of Iran's export portfolio, especially in the field of petrochemical products, along with Iran's membership in BRICS and the use of existing processes in this organization for de-dollarization, are the facilities available to develop Iran's exchanges under sanctions.
Keywords

  1. Acemoglu, , & Restrepo, P. (2019). The wrong kind of AI? Artificial intelligence and the future of labour demand. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society.
  2. Ahmadi, M., Rezaei, H., & Kazemi, F. (2019). Application of machine learning algorithms in forecasting energy consumption in the industrial sector.
  3. Blackwill, R. , & Harris, M. (2016). War by other means: Geoeconomics and statecraft. Harvard University Press.
  4. Chaziza, M. (2020). The impact of US sanctions on Iran's engagement and integration in the Belt and Road Initiative. Digest of Middle East Studies, 29(2), 167– https://doi.org/10.1111/dome.12215
  5. Desai, R., & Hudson, M. (2021). Beyond the Dollar creditocracy: A geopolitical economy. Valdai Papers, 116. https://doi.org/10.500.12592/190t0z
  6. Dettling, M. (2020). Applied time series analysis. Institute for Data Analysis and Process Design, Zurich University of Applied Sciences.
  7. Draca, M., Garred, J., Stickland, L., & Warrinnier, N. (2023). On target? Sanctions and the economic interests of elite policymakers in Iran. The Economic Journal, 133(649), 159– https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueac042
  8. Gaur, A., Settles, A., & Väätänen, J. (2023). Do economic sanctions work? Evidence from the Russia–Ukraine conflict. Journal of Management Studies, 60(6), 1391–1414. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12933
  9. Green, W., & Roth, (2021). China–Iran relations: A limited but enduring strategic partnership. USChina Economic and Security Review Commission, Article No. 2021-06.
  10. Heuleppa, A. (2023). The statuses of de-dollarization in the Indian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 10(1), 326–332. https://www.jetir.org/view?paper=JETIR2301545
  11. Ianchovichina, E., Devarajan, S., & Lakatos, C. (2016). Lifting economic sanctions on Iran: Global effects and strategic responses. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, Article No. 7549. https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/1813-9450-7549
  12. Jeong, M. (2019). Do sanction types affect the duration of economic sanctions? The case of foreign aid. International Political Science Review, 40(2), 231– https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512117753150
  13. Liu, Z., & Papa, M. (2022). Can BRICS de-dollarize the global financial system? Cambridge: University Printing House.
  14. Maloney, S. (2015). Sanctions and the Iranian nuclear deal: Silver bullet or blunt object? Social Research, 82(4), 887–911. https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2015.0064
  15. Molodyko, K. (2020). From reserve currencies to reserves of critical goods: Designing a new BRICS international currency. BRICS Law Journal, 7(4), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2020-7-4-67-84
  16. Mirkina, I. (2018). FDI and sanctions: An empirical analysis of short- and long-run effects. European Journal of Political Economy, 54(2), 198–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.05.008
  17. National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). (2012). Public Law, Congressional Budget Office, Article No. 1298.
  18. Presidential Documents. (2011). Executive Order 13590, Office of Foreign Assets Control, Federal Register, AE 590.
  19. Presidential Documents. (2012). Executive Order 13628 of October 9, 2012, Office of Foreign Assets Control, Federal Register, AE 7.198.
  20. Presidential Documents. (2014). Executive Order 13645 of June 3, 2013, Code of Federal Regulations, AE 106.
  21. Sciortino, R. (2022). Internationalization of the renminbi yuan and de-dollarization. In The US–China rift and its impact on globalization: Crisis, strategy, transitions (Trieste Asterios: Editore).
  22. Shagina, M. (2022). Western financial warfare and Russia's de-dollarization strategy: How sanctions on Russia might reshape the global financial system. FIIA Briefing Paper, Article No. 339.
  23. Sutter, K., & Nelson, R. (2021). De-dollarization efforts in China and Russia. Congressional Research Service, Article No. 2021-885. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11885
  24. The Council of The European Union. (2012). Concerning restrictive measures against Iran. Official Journal of the European Union, Article No. 267/2012.
  25. S. Congress Act. (2016). Iran sanctions act of 1996. Public Law, Article No. 114-277.
  26. US Congress Act. (2010). Comprehensive Iran sanctions, accountability, and divestment act of 2010. Public Law, Article No. 111–195.
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.